|
EFFECTS OF COWPEA
FORTIFICATION, DEHYDRATION METHOD AND STORAGE TIME ON SOME QUALITY
CHARACTERISTICS OF MAIZE-BASED TRADITIONAL WEANING FOODS
Afoakwa EO*1, Sefa-Dedeh S1
and E Sakyi-Dawson1
ABSTRACT
Fortification of cereal-based traditional foods with legume
protein can improve their nutritional value. It is, however, important
to find out the extent to which the addition of cowpea affects the
desirable quality characteristics of traditional weaning foods prepared
from fermented maize and also to assess the effect of dehydration
method and storage time on the chemical, physico-chemical and functional
properties of the products. A 3 x 2 x 4 factorial experiment with
cowpea level, drying method and storage time as the respective variables
was done. The traditional weaning food was prepared by steeping
maize in water for 24 hours, mixed with cowpea and co-milled into
a meal. A 50%-moisture dough was made with the addition of water
and fermented for 24 hours. The product was dried using solar drier
(40-60 °C for 72 hours) and oven drier (60 °C for 8 hours),
and packaged in polypropylene bags prior to the analysis. Proximate
analysis, pH, titratable acidity, fat acidity, water absorption
and cooked paste viscosity were monitored over six months under
tropical ambient conditions (28 °C, RH 85-100%). Cowpea addition
caused only minimal changes in the studied indices with the exception
of protein content, which increased from 10.54-14.34% and 10.71-14.42%
with 20% cowpea level, respectively, for the solar and oven-dried
products. Likewise, no major changes in proximate composition were
detected during storage. The product pH and fat acidity increased
with concomitant decreases in titratable acidity in the stored samples.
The pH levels increased from 4.67 – 5.18 and 4.13 - 4.71,
respectively, in the solar-dried and oven-dried products within
the six months storage period whilst titratable acidity levels decreased
slightly during storage of the product. The cowpea level, drying
method and storage time showed comparable variations on the cooked
paste characteristics measured. The application of cowpea fortification
and dehydration to traditional weaning foods is, therefore, a viable
option of promoting the nutritional qualities of traditional weaning
foods with prolonged shelf life stability.
Key words: Cowpea fortification, dehydration method, storability,
traditional weaning foods, chemical and functional properties.
FRENCH
Effets de l'enrichissement avec du niébé, la méthode de déshydratation et la durée de conservation sur certaines caractéristiques qualitatives des aliments de sevrage traditionnels à base de maïs
Resumé
L'enrichissement des aliments traditionnels à base de céréales par adjonction de protéines végétales (légumineuses) est susceptible d'améliorer leur valeur nutritionnelle. Cependant, il est essentiel de connaître l'étendue des effets de l'adjonction du niébé sur les caractéristiques qualitatives souhaitables des aliments traditionnels de sevrage préparés à partir du maïs fermenté. Il est également important d'évaluer l'incidence que la méthode de déshydratation et la durée de conservation ont sur les propriétés chimiques, physico-chimiques et fonctionnelles des produits. Une expérience factorielle 3 x 2 x 4 a été faite avec comme variables respectifs la concentration de niébé, la méthode de déshydratation et la durée de conservation. L'aliment de sevrage traditionnel a été préparé de la manière suivante : on a laissé tremper du maïs dans l'eau pendant 24 heures, ensuite ce maïs a été mélangé aux niébés. Ce mélange a été broyé et réduit en farine. L'adjonction d'eau à cette farine a donné une pâte moelleuse (50% d'humidité) qu'on a laissée fermenter pendant 24 heures. Le produit a été séché en utilisant le séchoir solaire (40-60 °C pendant 72 heures) et dans un four de séchage (60 °C pendant 8 heures), et emballé dans des sachets en polypropylène avant d'être analysé. L'analyse de la composition, le pH, l'acidité titrable, l'acidité grasse, l'absorption de l'eau et la viscosité de la pâte cuite ont été suivis sur une période de six (6) mois dans les conditions tropicales ambiantes (28 °C, RH 85-100%). L'adjonction de niébé n'a pas causé de changements importants dans les indices étudiés, à l'exception de la teneur en protéines. Celle-ci a augmenté car elle est passée de 10,54 à 14,34% et de 10,71 à 14,42% avec une concentration de niébé de 20% respectivement pour les produits soumis au séchage solaire et ceux dont le séchage a été effectué au four. Il en est de même pour la composition globale : aucun changement important n'a été détecté pendant la conservation. Le pH du produit et l'acidité de la matière grasse ont augmenté tandis que le taux d'acidité titrable a diminué dans les échantillons conservés. Les concentrations du pH ont augmenté : elles sont passées de 4,67 à 5,18 et de 4,13 à 4,71 respectivement pour les produits séchés au soleil et ceux séchés au four pendant une période de six mois, tandis que les taux d'acidité titrable ont légèrement diminué pendant la conservation des produits. La concentration de niébé, la méthode de déshydratation et le temps de conservation ont montré des variations comparables sur les caractéristiques de la pâte cuite qui ont été mesurées. L'application de l'enrichissement avec du niébé et la méthode de déshydratation aux aliments de sevrage traditionnels est donc une option viable pour la promotion des qualités nutritionnelles des aliments de sevrage traditionnels conservés pendant une longue période.
Mots-clés : enrichissement avec du niébé, méthode de déshydratation, aptitude à la conservation, propriétés chimiques et fonctionnelles, aliments de sevrage traditionnels.
INTRODUCTION
Maize processing in West Africa is based on traditional indigenous
technology which utilizes local raw materials and in most cases,
local equipment. These technologies are simple, with most of them
having been developed through experience in the production of products
of desirable quality. Common unit operations involved include steeping,
sprouting, dehulling, milling, cooking (boiling, roasting, steaming)
and fermentation [1, 2].
Maize is processed into a wide range of foods and beverages which
are consumed as breakfast foods, main meals, or as snacks. One of
such foods made from maize is known as Koko which is commonly fed
to infants as a weaning food. It is prepared by soaking maize in
water for 24 hours, after which the maize grains are washed and
milled in a disc attrition mill. Water is added to the meal produced
and made into dough which is fermented for 24 hours. The tin slurry
is prepared by mixing a portion of the dough with water and this
is cooked into porridge which is sweetened with sugar before it
is given to children.
Traditional weaning foods are formulated based on local staples
usually cereal grains such as maize, sorghum and rice, and roots
and tubers such as yam and cassava [3]. These foods are eaten in
large quantities and are expected to provide the bulk of the proteins
needed for the children’s growth, but the quality of this
protein leaves much to be desired. The result is the provision of
foods with low nutritional value as they are not adequate sources
of micro- and macro-nutrients [4]. During cooking, the starch in
the staple foods binds water, requiring considerable amounts of
water to bring the consistency of porridges prepared from them to
levels suitable for child rearing. This lowers the energy and nutrient
density of the porridge considerably and makes it difficult for
infants fed these gruels to satisfy their nutritional requirements.
The use of legumes such as cowpeas has been successfully used to
increase the nutritional value of weaning foods and as well several
researches have been done towards the development of some high-protein
weaning foods from local staples [5-7]. Cowpeas have high protein
content and constitute the natural protein supplements to staple
diets. Protein quality is synergistically improved in cereals-legume
blends because of the lysine contributed by the cowpea and methionine
contributed by the cereal [8].
The techniques commonly employed in weaning food developments include
the formulation of high-quality protein foods and the enrichment
of traditional foods by the incorporation of local staples. These
processing technologies are traditional and facilitate the utilization
of food by converting the local raw materials into diverse end products
with desirable quality characteristics. However, most of these traditional
weaning foods are usually not stored, thus limiting their widespread
use. In an attempt to develop products with low moisture content
to prolong their shelf-life, Ghanaian fermented maize dough was
dehydrated using a cabinet drier at 60 °C to develop a product
with shelf life of at least 16 weeks [9]. In another study, satisfactory
results were obtained by dehydrating fermented Ogi (a Nigerian maize
product) by drum-drying with no significant changes in chemical
composition and had prolonged storage stability [10]. Studies on
traditional weaning foods that can retain their quality characteristics
during storage is therefore important and deserves in-depth investigation.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of cowpea
fortification, dehydration method and storage time on the chemical
and functional properties of traditional weaning foods.
.MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Maize (Zea mays. L. cv Obatampa) and cowpea (Vigna
unguiculata. cv Amantin) were purchased from Ejura Farms in
Accra, Ghana and used for the study.
Preparation of cowpea-fortified weaning foods
Maize dough was prepared using the traditional method of first cleaning,
washing and steeping in water for 24 hours. Dehulled cowpea was
added to the maize at 10 and 20% concentration and the maize-cowpea
blend milled using a disc attrition mill (Agrico Model 2A, New Delhi)
into a meal. The meal was made into a 50% moisture dough and allowed
to ferment at room temperature for 24 hours to obtain the cowpea-fortified
fermented maize dough. The dough was then divided into two parts.
One part of it was dried in a solar drier (40-60 °C) for 72
hours and milled into flour using a hammer mill (Christy and Norris
Ltd, England), to pass through sieve number 6 (Approx) ASTM 35 and
the flour packaged for the storage studies. The other portion of
the dough was dried using an oven drier (Model OV-160, Gallenkamp,
England) at 60 °C for 8 hours and milled into flour using a
hammer mill, to pass through sieve number 6 (Approx) ASTM 35 and
the flour packaged for the storage studies. The samples were packaged
in polypropylene bags and stored under tropical ambient conditions
(26-31 °C, R H 85-100%) for a period of 6 months. Samples were
analyzed after 0, 2, 4, and 6 months of storage for proximate analyses
(moisture, fat, ash, protein and carbohydrate), pH and titratable
acidity, fat acidity, water absorption and cooked paste viscosity.
Experimental Design
A 2 x 3 x 4 factorial experimental design was used and the principal
factors were:
i. Drying method: Solar drying and oven drying
ii. Cowpea level : 0%, 10% and 20%.
iii. Storage period: 0, 2, 4 and 6 months.
METHODS
Chemical analyses
The moisture, crude protein (N x 6.25), fat and ash contents were
determined by Association of Official Analytical Chemists' Approved
methods 925.10, 920.87, 920.85, 923.03 and 963.09, respectively
[11]. Carbohydrate contents were determined by difference. The American
Association of Cereal Chemists' Approved Methods 02-01A was used
for fat acidity determination [12].
Water absorption capacity
Flour water absorption was determined by suspending 5.0 g in 30
ml of water and mixing. The mixture was allowed to stand for 10
minutes and mixing repeated times over one hour period, centrifuge
at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes. The supernatant was decanted and the
centrifuge tube weighed. Water absorption was calculated as the
increase in weight of the gel formed after decanting the supernatant.
Cooked paste viscosity
The cooked paste viscosity of slurries made from concentrations
of 10% (dry matter basis) flour in 500 ml water were measured using
Brabender Viscoamylograph (Brabender, Duisburg Germany) equipped
with a 700 cmg sensitivity cartridge. The viscosity of the slurries
were continuously monitored as they were heated from 25 °C at
a rate of 1.5 °C per minute to 95 °C and held at 95 °C
for 30 minutes, cooled to 50 °C at a rate of 1.5 °C per
minute and then held for 20 minutes at 50 °C. The Brabender
Viscoamylograph indices (pasting temperature, peak viscosity, viscosity
at 95 °C and 95 °C-Hold, and viscosity at 50 °C and
50 °C-Hold) were measured.
pH and Titratable Acidity
Ten grams of sample was mixed in 100 ml of CO2 -free distilled water.
The mixture was allowed to stand for 15 minutes, shaken at 5 minutes
interval and filtered with Whatman No. 4 filter paper. The pH of
the filtrate was measured using a pH meter (Model HM-30S, Tokyo,
Japan). Ten (10) ml aliquots (triplicates) were pipetted and titrated
against 0.1M NaOH to phenolphthalein end-point and the acidity was
calculated as g lactic acid/100 g sample.
Statistical analyses
The data obtained from the determinations were statistically analyzed
using Statgraphics (Graphics Software System, STCC, Inc. U.S.A).
Comparisons between sample treatments and the indices were done
using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a probability p<0.05.
RESULTS
Effect of cowpea addition, dehydration method and storage on the
chemical composition
The moisture content of the formulated weaning foods showed no major
differences between the various treatments. The solar- and oven-dried
products had moisture contents ranging from 6.61% to 6.42% and 5.13%
to 5.29% respectively after processing (Table 1). However, storage
of the products caused slight increases in their moisture contents.
The solar-dried products increased from 6.61% to 6.82% whereas the
oven-dried products increased from 5.13% to 5.72% within the six
months of storage (Table 1). Similar results were reported on the
moisture content of some dehydrated fermented foods [2]. Analysis
of variance (ANOVA) conducted on the data showed that all the variables
(drying method, cowpea level and storage time) had no significant
effect (p<0.05) on the moisture content of the weaning foods
(Table 2). The ash contents of the samples increased with increasing
concentration of cowpea (Table 1). There were fluctuating levels
of ash contents between 2.32% and 2.66% with all the different products
in storage (Table 1). Statistical analysis showed that only cowpea
level had significant effect (p<0.05) on the ash contents of
the products. Drying method and storage time did not significantly
affect the ash contents of the products (Table 2). Likewise, increasing
the cowpea concentration (10-20%) increased the protein content
of the products from 10.54 to 14.34% and 10.71 to 14.42%, respectively,
for the solar- and oven-dried products (Table 1). However, the six
months of storage of the products caused no observable changes in
their protein contents (Table 1). Analysis of variance conducted
on the data indicated that drying method and storage time had no
significant effects (p<0.05) on the protein contents of the weaning
foods (Table 2). Contrary to this, cowpea level significantly affected
the protein contents of the traditional weaning foods. Decreasing
trends were observed in the fat contents of the products with increasing
cowpea concentration (Table 1). This may be due to the observation
that maize contains higher levels of fat than cowpeas [7]. Trends
observed during storage of the products indicated that no variations
in fat content occurred in the stored products (Table 2). ANOVA
conducted on the data indicated that the addition of cowpeas had
significant effect (p<0.05) on the fat content of the products
(Table 2). Variations in carbohydrate content were observed with
cowpea concentration. The data showed that the carbohydrate content
decreased with increasing cowpea concentration (Table 1). This agrees
with the observation that addition of cowpea decreases the carbohydrate
contents of maize-based traditional foods [13, 14]. Statistical
analysis on the data showed that only cowpea level significantly
affected (p<0.05) the carbohydrate content of the products. Drying
method and storage time did not significantly affect the carbohydrate
content (Table 2).
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES
pH and titratable acidity
The formulated weaning foods had pH values ranging between 4.13
and 4.98 after processing. The acidic nature of the products was
due to the production of lactic acid associated with maize dough
fermentation [15]. The pH of the unfortified products increased
from 4.67 to 4.98 and 4.13 to 4.26 with 20% cowpea levels respectively
for the solar- and oven-dried products. Storage caused slight increases
in pH in all the products (Figure 1) with concomitant decreases
in titratable acidity (Figure 2). The pH levels increased from 4.67 – 5.18 and 4.13 - 4.71, respectively, in the solar-dried and
oven-dried products within the six months storage period. Contrary
to this trend, titratable acidity levels decreased slightly during
storage of the products (Figure 2). This suggests that some of the
acids produced during fermentation are lost during storage of the
products. Analysis of variance conducted on the data showed that
only the drying method significantly (p<0.05) affected the pH
and acidity levels of the weaning foods (Table 3).

Figure 1: Changes in pH of cowpea-fortified traditional weaning foods during storage

Figure 2: Changes in titratable acidity of cowpea-fortified traditional weaning foods during storage
FIGURES LEGEND
0% C-S : Unfortified solar-dried product
10% C-S : 10% cowpea-fortified solar-dried product
20% C-S : 20% cowpea-fortified solar-dried product
0% C-O : Unfortified oven-dried product
10% C-S : 10% cowpea-fortified oven-dried product
20% C-S : 20% cowpea-fortified oven-dried product
Fat acidity
Fat acidity increased from 204.20 – 214.95 (mg KOH/100 g dry
sample) and from 198.64 – 210.65 (mg KOH/100 g dry sample)
for the unfortified solar- and oven-dried products, respectively.
The rate of increase in fat acidity levels with the oven-dried products
during storage was, however, low as compared to those of the solar-dried
samples which increased tremendously during storage (Figure 3).
The drying method used for the preparation of the weaning foods
also influenced the degree of increase during storage of the products
since drying processes of food products determine their water activity
during prolonged storage. The water activity, oxygen partial pressure
and temperature in a pack have been observed to affect the rate
of lipid oxidation on foods during storage [16]. Statistical analysis
showed that the drying method, cowpea level and storage time significantly
(p<0.05) affected the fat acidity of the products (Table 3).
Figure 3: Changes in fat acidity of cowpea-fortified traditional weaning foods during storage
FIGURES LEGEND
0% C-S : Unfortified solar-dried product
10% C-S : 10% cowpea-fortified solar-dried product
20% C-S : 20% cowpea-fortified solar-dried product
0% C-O : Unfortified oven-dried product
10% C-S : 10% cowpea-fortified oven-dried product
20% C-S : 20% cowpea-fortified oven-dried product
Water absorption
Process treatment of raw materials is known to affect their hydration
properties [17]. During storage, the water absorption capacity of
the products showed variations over the storage period. In general,
slight decreases in water absorption capacity were observed with
storage time of the products. The oven-dried samples showed comparatively
higher rates of decrease than the solar-dried products (Figure 4),
which compares well with observations made when working on some
solar-dried and oven-dried cowpea-fortified traditional foods [2].
Water absorption decreased from 205.27-183.62 (g/100 g dry sample)
and from 198.80-156.24 (g/100 g dry sample), respectively, for the
solar- and oven-dried products during the six months of storage.
Water absorption characteristics are attributed to the protein and
starch granules present in the samples as well as their arrangements,
and the degree of packing of the granules determine the intermolecular
spaces available at the surfaces of the products [18]. Statistical
analysis indicated that the drying method and storage time had significant
effects (p<0.05) on the water absorption pattern of the products
(Table 3). Cowpea level, however, had no influence on the changes
observed on the products during storage. 
Figure 4: Changes in water absorption capacity of cowpea-fortified traditional weaning foods during storage
FIGURES LEGEND
0% C-S : Unfortified solar-dried product
10% C-S : 10% cowpea-fortified solar-dried product
20% C-S : 20% cowpea-fortified solar-dried product
0% C-O : Unfortified oven-dried product
10% C-S : 10% cowpea-fortified oven-dried product
20% C-S : 20% cowpea-fortified oven-dried product
Cooked paste characteristics
The results showed that the pasting temperatures of the products
were not affected by cowpea fortification, dehydration method and
storage time (Table 4). This means that the fortified and unfortified
products would take similar times to gelatinize during cooking.
However, increasing cowpea concentrations led to increases in the
viscosity of the products at 95 °C and 95 °C-HOLD. Since the
viscosity at 95 °C and 95 °C-HOLD are indicative of the
viscosity of products during cooking, the observed trend with cowpea
addition suggests that cowpea fortification would slightly prolong
the cooking times of the fortified products. Contrary to this trend,
increasing cowpea concentration led to decreases in the viscosities
at 50 °C and 50 °C-HOLD (Table 4). Storage caused only slight
variations in the Brabender viscoamylograph indices with drying
method and cowpea level after six months (Table 4). Statistical
analysis on the data indicated that only the drying method used
for the preparation of the weaning foods significantly (p<0.05)
affected the indices studied (Table 3). This significant change
with drying method is attributed to the varying degrees of dryness
brought about by the different drying methods used during the preparation
of the products.
DISCUSSION
The moisture content of the formulated weaning foods showed no major
differences between the various treatments. Even though slight variations
were reported, the moisture changes in the products were not high
enough to influence the product quality during the six months of
storage. These variations might have resulted from the fortification
of cowpeas to the weaning foods during formulation. Earlier studies
reported that ash content of cowpeas is higher than that of maize
[7]. Similar ash contents have been reported on fermented maize-cowpea
blends [5]. During storage of the products, no remarkable changes
in the ash content were observed. This explains that the ash content
of cowpea-fortified traditional weaning foods therefore increase
with cowpea concentration. On the contrary, the protein contents
of the products showed variations with the addition of cowpeas.
Initial studies on fermented maize revealed that the protein quality
and quantity of the products improved considerably with cowpea fortification
[7]. The use of cowpea as a fortifying agent has been reported to
improve the protein content of cereal diets [2, 13, 14]. This explains
that fortification of maize-based foods with cowpea increases their
protein content. However, the six months of storage of the products
caused no observable changes in their protein contents. Contrary
to the trends observed for the protein contents, decreasing trends
were observed in the fat contents of the products with increasing
cowpea concentration. This may be due to the observation that maize
contains higher levels of fat than cowpeas [7]. Therefore, increasing
cowpea concentration in traditional weaning foods leads to decreases
in their corresponding fat contents. Addition of cowpeas to cereal-based
weaning foods, therefore, decreases the fat contents of the products.
Storage time and drying method however had no significant effect
on the product fat contents. Variations in carbohydrate content
were also observed with cowpea concentration. However, during storage
of the products, no major changes occurred in their carbohydrate
contents within the six months of storage.
Cowpea fortification was observed to increase the pH and to decrease
titratable acidity of the products. This means that slight increases
in pH occurs during storage of cowpea-fortified fermented weaning
foods resulting in the loss of acids in the products. This increase
in pH and consequential decrease in acidity associated with storage
of cereal-based foods have been reported [2, 14]. The statistical
analysis showed no significant effect with storage time on the pH
and acidity of the formulated weaning foods, explaining that even
though some acids were lost during storage of the products, their
impact on the product quality was minimal and could not influence
the storage quality of the weaning foods. The fat acidity levels
of the products were observed to vary with the fortification with
cowpea. Increasing cowpea concentration in the products decreased
the fat acidity contents. It has been reported that cowpeas have
low fat acidity levels ranging from 32.2 to 34.6% [2]. Hence, the
addition of cowpea to maize-based products which have relatively
high fat acidity levels tend to decrease the fat acidity of the
cowpea-fortified products. Similarly, storage caused increases in
fat acidity of the products (Figure 3). This observation might be
due to the barrier effects of the different drying temperatures
used in the preparation of the products. The water activity, oxygen
partial pressure and temperature in a pack have been observed to
affect the rate of lipid oxidation on foods during storage [16].
Water absorption capacity is an important index, which gives valuable
information on the behaviour of weaning food products during reconstitution
in hot or cold water. Addition of cowpeas improved the water absorption
potential of the samples. This was probably due to the influence
of added proteins in the products. Proteins are mainly responsible
for the bulk uptake of water and to a lesser extent the starch and
cellulose at room temperature. The gelatinization of starch and
the denaturation of proteins that is the result of the application
of heat treatment to cowpeas have been suggested to improve the
water absorbing capacity of cowpea [14].
The Brabender viscoamylograph presents useful information on the
hot and cold paste viscosity of starch based foods. Cowpea fortification
at concentrations of 10% and 20% influenced some of the Brabender
viscosity indices. The pasting temperatures of the stored products
showed no observable variation during storage of the products. The
peak viscosity and viscosity at 95 °C of the oven- and solar-dried
samples showed slight fluctuations during storage with the different
cowpea levels used. However, these observed changes did not affect
the quality of the cooking characteristics of the weaning foods
since the observed differences were not wide. The cooking qualities
of the weaning foods studied were, therefore, not affected by storage
time and cowpea level, which implies that the cooking characteristics
of the products remained unchanged during storage.
CONCLUSION
The use of cowpea as a fortifying agent effectively increased the
protein and ash contents of the weaning foods. No major variations
in chemical composition and functional properties were noted with
dehydration method and storage time. However, increases in pH and
fat acidity occurred with corresponding decreases in titratable
acidity and water absorption capacity during storage of the products.
The cooked paste characteristics were not influenced by any of the
studied indices. Dehydration and cowpea fortification can, therefore,
be employed for the production of high protein maize-based traditional
weaning foods that can be stored for longer periods of time.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study was funded through the Bean-Cowpea Collaborative Research
Support Program by the United States Agency for International Development
- Grant No. DAN-1310-G-SS-6008-00.
Table 1
Effects of cowpea fortification, dehydration method and storage time on the proximate composition of traditional weaning foods |
Characteristic |
Drying method |
Cowpea level % |
Storage time (Months) |
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
Moisture (%) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
6.61
6.29
6.42 |
6.64
6.34
6.63 |
6.73
6.42
6.59 |
6.82
6.58
6.72 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
5.13
5.18
5.29 |
5.26
5.21
5.32 |
5.34
5.25
5.28 |
5.23
5.42
5.72 |
Ash (%) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
2.47
2.51
2.64 |
2.43
2.60
2.69 |
2.48
2.55
2.63 |
2.41
2.61
2.58 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
2.42
2.49
2.62 |
2.44
2.52
2.57 |
2.38
2.46
2.55 |
2.32
2.38
2.66 |
Protein* (%) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
10.54
12.71
14.34 |
10.47
12.77
14.44 |
10.52
12.85
14.26 |
10.48
12.89
14.64 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
10.71
12.64
14.42 |
10.47
12.77
14.34 |
10.56
12.82
14.28 |
10.48
12.62
14.36 |
Fat (%) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
4.52
4.32
3.66 |
4.58
4.26
3.75 |
4.26
4.47
3.85 |
4.49
4.41
3.67 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
4.45
4.32
3.63 |
4.36
4.28
3.48 |
4.52
4.35
3.72 |
4.48
4.37
3.68 |
Carbohydrate** (%) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
75.67
74.17
73.43 |
75.94
74.12
73.24 |
79.67
73.93
73.07 |
75.95
73.89
73.31 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
77.36
75.34
74.12 |
77.32
75.25
74.28 |
77.12
75.18
74.08 |
77.34
75.10
74.19 |
*N x 6.25
** By difference
Mean values of replicates, on dry matter basis |
Table 2
F-ratios of process variables of the proximate composition of cowpea-fortified traditional weaning foods |
Index |
Drying method |
Cowpea level |
Storage time |
Moisture |
0.132 |
0.223 |
1.285 |
Ash |
0.637 |
8.73* |
1.162 |
Protein |
8.842 |
788.243* |
2.418 |
Fat |
0.365 |
91.196* |
0.571 |
Carbohydrate |
2.763 |
160.974* |
1.894 |
*Significant F-ratio at p<0.05 |
Table 3
Significant F-ratios of process variables of the physico-chemical and functional properties |
Index |
|
|
|
pH |
|
|
|
Titratable acidity |
|
|
|
Fat acidity |
|
|
|
Water absorption |
|
|
|
Pasting temperature |
|
|
|
Peak viscosity |
|
|
|
Viscosity at 95 oC |
|
|
|
Viscosity at 95 oC-HOLD |
|
|
|
Viscosity at 50 oC |
|
|
|
Viscosity at 50 oC-HOLD |
|
|
|
Significance at p<0.05 |
Table 4
Effects of cowpea fortification, dehydration method and storage time on the cooked paste characteristics of traditional weaning foods
|
Characteristic |
Drying method |
Cowpea level % |
|
|
|
|
|
Pasting temperature (oC) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
72.6
73.2
72.8 |
73.2
73.8
73.1 |
73.1
72.9
73.6 |
73.4
73.0
72.8 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
73.2
73.4
73.8 |
73.0
73.2
73.1 |
73.6
73.5
73.4 |
73.8
73.2
73.2 |
Peak viscosity (BU) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
2860
2660
2620 |
2800
2670
2610 |
2880
2640
2630 |
2840
2660
2640 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
2780
2620
2600 |
2700
2610
2600 |
2740
2620
2580 |
2720
2630
2620 |
Viscosity at 95 oC (BU) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
1150
1180
1270 |
1130
1150
1240 |
1120
1180
1260 |
1140
1160
1270 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
1120
1160
1250 |
1100
1130
1260 |
1120
1140
1240 |
1100
1150
1220 |
Viscosity at 95 oC-HOLD (BU) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
900
910
930 |
930
910
940 |
910
890
920 |
920
910
940 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
890
900
920 |
870
880
910 |
900
890
920 |
880
910
910 |
Viscosity at 50 oC (BU) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
2720
2460
2400 |
2680
2430
2440 |
2660
2450
2400 |
2640
2480
2440 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
2680
2380
2200 |
2640
2340
2480 |
2620
2360
2140 |
2630
2280
2180 |
Viscosity at 50 oC-HOLD (BU) |
Solar-dried |
0
10
20 |
2640
2600
2580 |
2610
2620
2580 |
2650
2580
2560 |
2640
2600
2580 |
Oven-dried |
0
10
20 |
2630
2560
2530 |
2610
2550
2510 |
2600
2530
2500 |
2610
2540
2520 |
BU: Brabender Units |
REFERENCES
1. Sefa-Dedeh S and EO Mensah Traditional Food Processing Technology
and High Protein Food Production. Food and Nutr. Bull. 1991; 13:
43-49.
2. Afoakwa EO Storage Characteristics and Quality Evaluation of
Cowpea-fortified
Traditional Foods. BSc Dissertation, Department of Nutrition and
Food Science,
University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana, 1996.
3. Bressani R and E Elias Guidelines for the Development of Processed
and Packaged Weaning Foods. Food and Nutr. Bull. 1983; 5: 32-36.
4. Brown KH The Importance of Dietary Quality Versus Quantity for
Weanlings in the Developed Countries; A Framework for Discussion.
Food and Nutr. Bull. 1991; 13: 86-93.
5. Sefa-Dedeh S and YM Kluvitse Development of Cowpea-fortified
Weaning Foods: Functional and Chemical Properties. Paper presented
at the Annual Meeting of the Institute of Food Technologists, Atlanta,
Georgia, 3-7 June 1995.
6. Akpapunam MA and S Sefa-Dedeh Traditional Lactic Acid Fermentation,
Malt Addition and Quality Development in Maize-cowpea Weaning Blends.
Food and Nutr. Bull. 1995; 16: 75-80.
7. Kluvitse YM Development of Cowpea-Fortified Weaning Foods: Consumer
Expectations, Functional and Chemical Properties. MPhil Thesis,
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Legon,
Ghana, 1995.
8. Bressani R Grain Quality of Beans. Food Rev Int 1993; 9: 287-297.
9. Plahar WA, Leung HK and CN Coon Effects of Dehydration and Soy
Fortification on Physico-chemical, Nutritional and Sensory Properties
of Ghanaian Fermented. J. Food Sci. 1983; 48: 1255-1257.
10. Adonji K and N Potter Effect of dehydration on fermented Ogi.
J. Sci. Food Agric. 1978; 23:101-111.
11. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 13th Edn. Association of
Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C, 1990.
12. AACC. Approved Methods of Analysis of the American Association
of Cereal
Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 1983.
13. Sefa-Dedeh S, Frimpong K, Afoakwa EO and E Sakyi-Dawson Cowpea
Fortification of Traditional Foods. Presented at the World Cowpea
Research Conference III, Ibadan, Nigeria, 4-7 September 2000.
14. Sefa-Dedeh SK, Sakyi-Dawson EO, Afoakwa EO, Andoh-Kumi K and
K Tano-Debrah Effect of Drying Method, Packaging Material and Storage
on the Quality of Cowpea-Based Weaning Foods. Paper Presented At
The Annual Meeting of the Institute of Food Technologists, New Orleans,
USA, 25-28 June, 2001.
15. Jespersen L, Halm M, Kpodo K and M Jakobsen The Significance
of Yeasts and Moulds Occurring in Maize Dough Fermentation for Kenkey
Production. Int J Food Micr 1994; 24: 239-248.
16. Quast DG and M Karel Effects of Environmental Factors on the
Oxidation of Potato Chips. J. Food Sci. 1972; 37: 584-588.
17. Phillips RD, Chinnan MS, Branch AC, Miller J and KH McWatters Effects of Pretreatment on Functional and Nutritional Properties
of Cowpea Meal. J. Food Sci. 1988; 53: 805-809.
18. Pfeiffer C Optimizing Food Packaging and Shelf-life. Food Tech.
1999; 9: 159-167.
|